The Government of National Blame

Regular readers to this blog may have spotted my prediction on 4 April here that Operation “Nail Starmer” had begun. I foresaw that Starmer would be invited into the General’s tent, when Corbyn was not.

Today, twenty-three days later from Starmer’s ascension, on his first day back after his brush with death, Reckless Boris said he would bring “in opposition parties as far as we possibly can because I think that there is no less that what the British people would expect…” Sensible British people expected this move months ago.

Why this move now? From the country’s perspective, the optimum time to involve opposition parties was during the five COBRA meetings which Reckless Boris missed. Opposition parties were ignored at the outset because of Corbyn’s toxicity and the Tories’ delusion of competence. Quite simply, Starmer would have been invited to the party many days ago had it not been for the PM’s absence.

As Reckless Boris told us today, now is the time of maximum risk – that’s why this amoral political genius will look to Labour for political cover. But will Starmer get involved? If he doesn’t, Starmer will be painted as unpatriotic, but if he can withstand that criticism, and the country’s fortunes nosedive, we may see an election before the five years specified in the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act. Providing the narrative – that Reckless Boris missed five COBRA meetings – is repeated ad nauseum, the Tories will be toast.

Skilled Starmer must dance on the head of a pin in order to escape the accusation of treason – for not helping the PM in this hour of need; in addition, he must dodge the charge of Joint Enterprise – for being associated with economic collapse if he does join the quasi-Government of National Unity. Starmer must set a price which is both reasonable in the eyes of the public and yet unpalatable to Boris. Already the PM’s emissaries will be doing his bidding. As Boris is twice the political operator, my money is that he will get his man.

Postscript: The Times chose not to report the PM’s words about the potential involvement of opposition parties.

Published by Andrew Gray

I am an experienced lawyer and founder of Truth Legal Solicitors in Harrogate, North Yorkshire. I blog on a range of topics, including law and politics. These views are my own and do not represent those of Truth Legal.

One comment on “The Government of National Blame”

  1. Serial dishonesty, bluster and insouciance are trademarks of Johnson, the first two traits he shares with Trump. They are both unprincipled opportunists, and sociopaths. A further trait is that both think they are smarter than they actually are. I am interested, Andrew, if Starmer cooperates with a quasi government of national unity, and for that he will have conditions, the price you allude to, what is reasonable to the general public and unpalatable to Johnson. I am guessing that part of that would be a two year extension to the transition period. During that time Starmer and his team would steer the UK into close EU orbit. I could be completely wrong, I often am!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.